FIFA动态平衡系统信息疑遭员工泄露

作者：文体不分家 2017-10-29 14:28:53 足球比分

昨日，reddit fifa专区有人发帖声称EA机构内部员工泄露了EA机构旗下著名系列游戏FIFA的动态平衡系统信息，并附上了完整的PDF**，玩家常常抱怨的系统局，游戏中感觉到的滑块变化似乎都在这篇帖子中得到了验证。接下来让我们来看看这篇帖子的内容。

（附PDF**https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/16c4/5d99437bd43e0e60fe160f058e3d824ef79d.pdf）

EA are definitely in the business of dynamic difficulty adjustment, and a lot of what is in the papers below reflect peoples experience of FIFA.

EA肯定有动态难度调整的业务，以下这篇论文的内容里反映了玩家在玩FIFA时候的一些亲身经历。

The paper talks about a new model of dynamic difficulty for increasing player engagement. The example that they give is for a platform game, but say that it is applicable to other genres. I'm yet to digest the paper in full.

本文谈到了一个新的动态难度模块为了增加玩家的积极性。文章给出的例子是一个平台上的游戏，但也提到适用于其他类型。我目前还没有完全消化这篇论文的内容。

Edit:
And here's the patent for slider manipulation: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2017/0259177.html

以下是滑块操作的专利权

My own summary/some highlights:

我个人的总结和一些高见：

If users experience gameplay that is too hard/easy, they will stop playing – therefore companies seek methods to dynamically adjust difficulty

如果用户体验到游戏太难了或是太简单了，他们就不会玩了-因此机构寻求动态调节难度的方法。

Method involves selecting a seed value for a “knob” (think sliders). Knobs are set to maximise the amount of time people will play for.

方法包括选择一个“旋钮”的调整值（联想下滑块）。旋钮是用来最大限度增加人们玩游戏的时间。

Adjustments to the seed values reflect recent gameplay more than less recent (reason for bouncing **ween 5-0 wins and 1-0 losses in squad battles?).

这一种子值的调整映射出最近玩游戏的情况（这就是在单机周赛中5比0赢和0比1输掉大起大落的理由？）

A machine learning algorithm is used to decide on the seed value, based on interaction data

一个机器学习演算法被用来决定这个种子值，它根据于交互式数据。

Knobs are set based on your current perceived level of engagement. This might be determined by factors such as how long you play the game for, AND WHETHER OR NOT YOU H**E SPENT MONEY ON THE GAME (Emphasis my own, see detailed description section, paragraph 5 - seems a bit dodgy if this is in competitive game modes)

旋钮是根据于你当前游玩程度设定的。这可能决定于诸如你玩游戏的时间长短等因素，并且你是否有在游戏上花过钱。（强调一下，看论文第5段详细描述的部分-在竞技类游戏的模式下这做法似乎有些狡猾）

“Some other non-limiting examples of features of the video game that can be modified, which may or may not be detectable by the user can include providing extra speed to an in-game character, improving throwing accuracy of an in-game character, improving the distance or height that the in-game character can jump, adjusting the responsiveness of controls, and the like. In some cases, the adjustments may additionally or alternatively include reducing the ability of an in-game character rather than improving the ability of the in-game character. For example, the in-game character may be made faster, but have less shooting accuracy.” - Doesn’t take a huge leap of imagination to apply this to FIFA.

“其他一些有动态难度变化的电脑游戏的参考例子，用户在其中可能无法发觉包括为一个游戏角色提供额外的速度，提高一个游戏角色投掷的精准度，提高游戏角色可以跳跃的距离和高度，调整控制器的响应性，诸如此类的。在某些情况下，调整还包括降低游戏角色的能力而不是提高。比如，游戏内的角色可能会变快，但射门精度会变低。”—不难想象会将这个运用在FIFA上

It doesn't say explicitly that this methodology applies to FIFA, or whether it only affects certain modes - but a lot of it is consistent with my own experience and that of others.

并没有明确的说明这个方法运用在了FIFA上，或者它是否只影响了有些模式-但是我自己和其他人的经历都与之有很多相似处。

不知该消息是真是假，该论文是否真为内部员工所做，但小编自己在游玩FIFA18UT模式时，有时候电脑后卫的速度和防守强度上下半场的确有明显的变化。

（更多FIFA18咨询尽在欢呼吧）

本场战报由欢呼吧足球AI智能编辑系统发布

* 所有言论仅代表发布者个人意见，与足球魔方无关，请看官自行核实内容

本文由欢呼吧/cubegoal原创，禁止一切形式的引用，一经发现必追究法律责任

上一篇：卡瓦尼与梅尔滕斯锁定FIFA18UT模式第七周周黑席位
下一篇：FIFA18德甲开荒ST推荐之萌新可能不知道的丹麦神塔